My $47,000 Mistake Trading the Fed (And Why I'd Make It Again)
- Fabio Capela
- Trading mistakes , Fed trading , Risk management , Systematic trading , Market events , Trading psychology , Strategy development , Volatility trading
- August 25, 2025
Table of Contents
March 2022. Fed day. I’m sitting at three monitors with $470k positioned for a rate hike that “everyone knew was coming.”
Twelve minutes later I’m down $47,000 and my coffee mug is in pieces on the floor.
The Setup That Couldn’t Fail
Powell had been telegraphing this hike for months. Every Fed speaker, every dot plot, every piece of data pointed to 25 basis points. The market had it priced at 97% probability.
My system had been crushing it on Fed days. Simple pattern:
- Market overreacts to the announcement
- Algos go crazy for 5 minutes
- Reversion to the mean within 30 minutes
- Easy 1-2% scalp
Six Fed meetings in a row, this worked. Average gain: $8,400 per event. I was printing money on a schedule.
So obviously, I sized up.
The Twelve Minutes from Hell
2:00 PM: Fed announces 25bps. Exactly as expected.
2:00:01 PM: SPY drops 40 cents instantly. Perfect, going according to plan.
2:00:47 PM: My short volatility positions are up $12k. I’m a genius.
2:01:15 PM: Something’s wrong. VIX isn’t dropping. It’s climbing.
2:01:45 PM: Powell starts talking. Uses the word “aggressive.” Market doesn’t like it.
2:03:00 PM: Full reversal. Now down $8k. No problem, seen this before.
2:05:00 PM: Down 22k dollars. This isn’t normal. But my stop loss is at $50k, still room.
2:08:00 PM: Volatility explodes. The reversion isn’t happening. Down $35k.
2:11:00 PM: Correlation goes to 1. Everything moves together. My “hedges” are worthless.
2:12:00 PM: Stop loss triggers. Final damage: -$47,200.
2:12:30 PM: Coffee mug meets wall. Wife texts “how’s Fed day going?”
What Actually Happened
Took me weeks to figure out what went wrong. The issue wasn’t the Fed decision—it was the press conference tone. Powell said “aggressive” three times, “front-loaded” twice, and “expeditiously” once.
The algos went insane.
But here’s what really killed me: everyone else was running the same mean reversion strategy. When we all headed for the exits together, there was no liquidity. Spreads went from 1 cent to 20 cents. Market makers pulled back. My “liquid” ETF positions became quicksand.
The reversion did happen eventually. About 2 hours later. Right after I was stopped out.
The Expensive Lessons
Lesson 1: Crowded trades unwind violently
When a strategy becomes too obvious, it stops working. Not gradually—instantly. Like a rubber band snapping. My Fed day pattern had worked too well for too long. Every quant shop in Manhattan was running variations of it.
Lesson 2: Correlation breaks exactly when you need it
My “diversified” position was:
- Short volatility (VXX puts)
- Long big tech (QQQ calls)
- Short bonds (TLT puts)
- Long financials (XLF)
In theory, these shouldn’t all move together. In practice, they all died together. When liquidity disappears, everything is correlated.
Lesson 3: Stop losses in volatile events are donations to HFTs
My stop loss at -50k dollars seemed conservative. But in that chaos, I got filled at -47k dollars on positions that recovered to -$15k twenty minutes later. The high-frequency traders thank me for my donation.
Why I’d Do It Again
Sounds insane, right? Lost $47k in 12 minutes and I’d do it again?
Here’s the thing—that loss taught me more about market microstructure than 5 years of profitable trading. I learned:
- How liquidity actually works (it doesn’t when you need it)
- Why consensus trades are dangerous (everyone rushes the exit together)
- When systematic strategies break (during regime changes)
- How market makers operate (they disappear when volatility spikes)
That $47k tuition led me to completely rebuild my approach. No more event trading. No more crowded strategies. No more assuming liquidity.
The new system has made back that $47k about fifteen times over.
The Current Approach
Now I do the opposite of consensus:
- When everyone’s trading an event, I’m flat
- When strategies get popular, I abandon them
- When backtests look too good, I assume they’re broken
- When liquidity seems guaranteed, I plan for it to vanish
Boring? Yes. Profitable? Also yes.
The market paid me 8,400 dollars six times to set up a $47,000 lesson. Expensive education, but I’ve met traders who learned the same lesson with seven figures.
Your Fed Day Is Coming
Every trader has their Fed day coming. That moment when the “sure thing” becomes a disaster. When your bulletproof strategy meets reality’s armor-piercing rounds.
You can read about it, study it, backtest around it. But until you live it—until you feel that sick feeling watching your P&L hemorrhage while you’re frozen at the keyboard—you don’t really understand risk.
The question isn’t whether you’ll have this experience. It’s whether you’ll survive it and what you’ll learn from it.
My advice? Size down on “sure things.” Be suspicious of strategies that work too well. And always, always respect the market’s ability to humble you in seconds.
Because somewhere right now, another trader is sizing up on a “can’t lose” Fed trade.
Godspeed, friend. Keep that stop loss tight.
Still trading systematically at TheSimplePortfolio. Still avoiding Fed days. The $47k mug is framed in my office as a reminder.