My $47,000 Mistake Trading the Fed (And Why I'd Make It Again)

Table of Contents

March 2022. Fed day. I’m sitting at three monitors with $470k positioned for a rate hike that “everyone knew was coming.”

Twelve minutes later I’m down $47,000 and my coffee mug is in pieces on the floor.

The Setup That Couldn’t Fail

Powell had been telegraphing this hike for months. Every Fed speaker, every dot plot, every piece of data pointed to 25 basis points. The market had it priced at 97% probability.

My system had been crushing it on Fed days. Simple pattern:

  • Market overreacts to the announcement
  • Algos go crazy for 5 minutes
  • Reversion to the mean within 30 minutes
  • Easy 1-2% scalp

Six Fed meetings in a row, this worked. Average gain: $8,400 per event. I was printing money on a schedule.

So obviously, I sized up.

The Twelve Minutes from Hell

2:00 PM: Fed announces 25bps. Exactly as expected.

2:00:01 PM: SPY drops 40 cents instantly. Perfect, going according to plan.

2:00:47 PM: My short volatility positions are up $12k. I’m a genius.

2:01:15 PM: Something’s wrong. VIX isn’t dropping. It’s climbing.

2:01:45 PM: Powell starts talking. Uses the word “aggressive.” Market doesn’t like it.

2:03:00 PM: Full reversal. Now down $8k. No problem, seen this before.

2:05:00 PM: Down 22k dollars. This isn’t normal. But my stop loss is at $50k, still room.

2:08:00 PM: Volatility explodes. The reversion isn’t happening. Down $35k.

2:11:00 PM: Correlation goes to 1. Everything moves together. My “hedges” are worthless.

2:12:00 PM: Stop loss triggers. Final damage: -$47,200.

2:12:30 PM: Coffee mug meets wall. Wife texts “how’s Fed day going?”

What Actually Happened

Took me weeks to figure out what went wrong. The issue wasn’t the Fed decision—it was the press conference tone. Powell said “aggressive” three times, “front-loaded” twice, and “expeditiously” once.

The algos went insane.

But here’s what really killed me: everyone else was running the same mean reversion strategy. When we all headed for the exits together, there was no liquidity. Spreads went from 1 cent to 20 cents. Market makers pulled back. My “liquid” ETF positions became quicksand.

funny picture of trader losing money

The reversion did happen eventually. About 2 hours later. Right after I was stopped out.

The Expensive Lessons

Lesson 1: Crowded trades unwind violently

When a strategy becomes too obvious, it stops working. Not gradually—instantly. Like a rubber band snapping. My Fed day pattern had worked too well for too long. Every quant shop in Manhattan was running variations of it.

Lesson 2: Correlation breaks exactly when you need it

My “diversified” position was:

  • Short volatility (VXX puts)
  • Long big tech (QQQ calls)
  • Short bonds (TLT puts)
  • Long financials (XLF)

In theory, these shouldn’t all move together. In practice, they all died together. When liquidity disappears, everything is correlated.

Lesson 3: Stop losses in volatile events are donations to HFTs

My stop loss at -50k dollars seemed conservative. But in that chaos, I got filled at -47k dollars on positions that recovered to -$15k twenty minutes later. The high-frequency traders thank me for my donation.

Why I’d Do It Again

Sounds insane, right? Lost $47k in 12 minutes and I’d do it again?

Here’s the thing—that loss taught me more about market microstructure than 5 years of profitable trading. I learned:

  • How liquidity actually works (it doesn’t when you need it)
  • Why consensus trades are dangerous (everyone rushes the exit together)
  • When systematic strategies break (during regime changes)
  • How market makers operate (they disappear when volatility spikes)

That $47k tuition led me to completely rebuild my approach. No more event trading. No more crowded strategies. No more assuming liquidity.

The new system has made back that $47k about fifteen times over.

The Current Approach

Now I do the opposite of consensus:

  • When everyone’s trading an event, I’m flat
  • When strategies get popular, I abandon them
  • When backtests look too good, I assume they’re broken
  • When liquidity seems guaranteed, I plan for it to vanish

Boring? Yes. Profitable? Also yes.

The market paid me 8,400 dollars six times to set up a $47,000 lesson. Expensive education, but I’ve met traders who learned the same lesson with seven figures.

Your Fed Day Is Coming

Every trader has their Fed day coming. That moment when the “sure thing” becomes a disaster. When your bulletproof strategy meets reality’s armor-piercing rounds.

You can read about it, study it, backtest around it. But until you live it—until you feel that sick feeling watching your P&L hemorrhage while you’re frozen at the keyboard—you don’t really understand risk.

The question isn’t whether you’ll have this experience. It’s whether you’ll survive it and what you’ll learn from it.

My advice? Size down on “sure things.” Be suspicious of strategies that work too well. And always, always respect the market’s ability to humble you in seconds.

Because somewhere right now, another trader is sizing up on a “can’t lose” Fed trade.

Godspeed, friend. Keep that stop loss tight.


Still trading systematically at TheSimplePortfolio. Still avoiding Fed days. The $47k mug is framed in my office as a reminder.

comments powered by Disqus

Related Posts

The One Number That Changed How I Think About Investment Risk

For years, I focused on the wrong metric when evaluating my investment performance. Like most investors, I obsessed over returns. How much did I make this month? How much did I make this year? How did my portfolio compare to the S&P 500?

Read More

Why Index Funds Are Sabotaging Your FIRE Timeline: The Systematic Solution

Most FIRE investors are unknowingly adding 5+ years to their retirement timeline by sticking with “safe” index funds. While the investment world preaches the gospel of passive investing, a growing number of sophisticated investors are achieving Financial Independence faster through systematic strategies.

Read More